Gun Safety No Laughing Matter
The dust is only beginning to settle in the wake of oral arguments heard before the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18 in the historic case of Heller v. District of Columbia. The day featured several lively exchanges, as both the justices and the attorneys for the two sides in the case sought to divine the historical context and present-day implications of the Second Amendment.
At issue in the Heller case are the District’s tough gun laws, which effectively ban handguns and require those who own long guns (i.e., shotguns and rifles) to keep them unloaded and either trigger-locked or disassembled in the home. The lead Plaintiff in the case, D.C. resident Dick Anthony Heller, has argued that these restrictions preclude his right to self-defense in the home and violate individual rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment. In the view of Heller and his attorneys, a firearm that must be kept unloaded and trigger locked is “non-functional” and of no use in a home invasion scenario.
Surprisingly, during Tuesday’s oral arguments, several of the justices seemed to not only openly side with Heller’s argument, but to stake out a stance on the storage of firearms in the home more laissez-faire than that advocated by the standard bearer for the gun lobby, the National Rifle Association (NRA).
One fascinating exchange occurred between Walter E. Dellinger III, the attorney arguing the case for the District, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia. Dellinger clarified that long guns in District can be kept either disassembled or trigger locked when stored in the home, and noted that releasing a trigger lock is a simple procedure. Justice Roberts pressed—exactly how long does it take to disable such a lock? Dellinger, who had tested a lock on a gun he owned, answered “three seconds.”
That apparently didn’t satisfy Justice Scalia, who had envisioned a hypothetical home invasion scenario of “somebody crawling in your bedroom window.” Addressing Dellinger, Justice Scalia sarcastically stated, “You turn on the lamp next to your bed so you can—you can turn the knob at 3-22-95.” Chief Justice Roberts followed with his own quip, which elicited laughter from the crowd: “you turn on the lamp, you pick up your reading glasses...” The two justices seemed to be implying that trigger locks eliminate the possibility of a firearm being used for self-defense. More disturbingly, they seemed to suggest that keeping firearms loaded and unsecured in the home was the most prudent storage practice. Also embracing this view was Justice Samuel Alito, who stated that D.C.’s firearm storage provisions could not survive “under any standard of review.”
A quick look at the NRA’s Gun Safety Rules webpage reveals just how far out of the mainstream these justices are. One of the NRA’s “fundamental” rules for safe gun handling is “ALWAYS keep the gun unloaded until ready to use.” The NRA also tells gun owners to always “store guns so they are not accessible to unauthorized persons,” noting that “dozens of gun storage devices, as well as locking devices that attach directly to the gun, are available.” In a “Parents Guide to Gun Safety,” the NRA also points out the potential dangers to children, stating “a parent must, in every case, assess the exposure of the firearm and absolutely ensure that it is inaccessible to a child.”
Dellinger is undoubtedly aware of these dangers. His two grandchildren likely spend more time in his home than armed criminals. It is mystifying that Chief Justice Roberts, who has two young children, is not equally aware of why kids and guns are a bad mix.
The fact is that guns in the home are a far greater threat to one’s family and intimates than to any imagined criminals. Living in a home where there are guns increases the risk of homicide by 40 to 170% and the risk of suicide by 90 to 460%. With its handgun ban and proactive safety and storage laws, the District of Columbia, in comparison with the 50 states, enjoys the 17th lowest accidental gun death rate and the second lowest suicide rate. Meanwhile, according to the FBI, firearms were used by private citizens in only 147 justifiable homicides in the U.S. in 2005. The total number of gun homicides that year? 12,352.
D.C.’s gun laws could live or die depending on what the Supreme Court defines as a “reasonable restriction.” Given the firearm safety recommendations of the gun lobby, and the level of evidence pointing to the risks of having unsecured firearms in the home, it is disingenuous to argue that the city’s trigger lock provision is unreasonable.
I would point to the words of Justice Stephen Breyer, who stated during the oral arguments that “we give…leeway to the city and States to work out what's reasonable in light of their problems.” Or as he later summarized concerning the controversy over trigger locks: “Do you want thousands of judges all over the United States to be deciding that kind of question rather than the city councils and the legislatures that have decided it in the context of passing laws?”
That question can be answered faster than the few seconds it takes to remove a trigger lock.
The Bullet Counter Points blog provides commentary on gun violence in America. You'll find interesting facts that contradict the conventional wisdom on firearms in America, news stories that missed the front page, and inspiring tales of efforts to prevent gun violence in communities across the country.
Blog Archive
Bullet Counter Points:
"Ordinary People" Series
- The Gun-Toting Soccer Mom
- A Tale of Two Terrorists
- "You can commit mass murder then still go to heaven."
- Back Nine
- Siege Mentality
- Attack of the Black Dwarves
- "It was almost like looking in the devil's eyes."
- "This Kid's Nothing But Trouble."
- The Fake Cop
- If at First You Don't Succeed...
- Parking Violation
- Bottoms Up
- Forgot Something?
- "I blew her away."
- Cowboy Up
- Road Rage
- "I had fun."
- "Reasonable Belief"
- A Case of "Self-Defense"
- The Hidden Handgun
- Folk Villain
- A Child's Party, A Family's Nightmare
- Tragedy in Stafford County
- Lack of Protection
- A Match Made in Hell
Monday, March 24, 2008
The Matter of “Non-Functional” Firearms
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Firearms which are not in use should be stored locked and unloaded. A hand gun in your night table while you sleep is in use as a personal protection weapon. Ditto if it is in your holster. If not in your immediate presence the weapon should be locked up. Hope this clears up your misunderstanding on weapons storage.
I think the biggest problem you're having here is that often politicians on your side of the debate have attempted to show, in public, how easy and fast it is to open these locks.
That wouldn't be a bad thing, except that in at least two famous cases, it turned out that they were the ones learning a lesson in how hard it is to get one open when you need to do so.
Personally, I keep most of my guns in a safe when I'm not using them. I have one that's usually either on me or in a fast-access safe from GunVault. I just open the GunVault at night and leave the gun in there. Then, in the morning, I can just close it and I'm all set to leave for work.
But that's my choice and my solution. I'm not going to say that other gun owners have to do things my way any more than I would insist that you have to own a gun. My way is my way and their ways are their ways.
George, I don't think we have any misunderstanding on gun storage. The NRA Gun Safety Guidelines make no clarification for a "self-defense exception" to safe gun storage. Nor do they argue that a gun is "in use" when its owner is asleep (an argument that on its face is clearly false). If you indeed do want to clarify or revise their policy, you should contact the NRA directly. - CSGV
Thanks for your comment, Don. We commend you for taking your responsibilities as a gun owner seriously and storing your firearms safely. Given the risk to children and others of having unsecured firearms in the home, however, we would disagree about whether it is reasonable for legislatures to enact laws concerning the safe storage of firearms. We believe it is reasonable and we believe the "non-functional" firearms argument is clearly a red herring given the advice of the gun lobby on this matter. - CSGV
SGV: the DC statute makes no exception for firearms in a house where no children are present. How can an assembled, unlocked firearm on the nightstand or next to the bed at night be a risk to children when they are not present?
Justice Breyer's comment would merit if he were talking about an issue like smoking in public. But infringement upon constitutional rights deserve judicial review. I sincerely doubt Justice Breyer would hold such an attitude concerning something like free speech or abortion. Should we leave such issues merely to the city councils and legislatures and not get judges "all over the United States" involved?
Jhardin, we imagine if might be difficult to create such an exemption. What if someone doesn't have children, but hosts visitors from time to time (possibly including children)? What about other individuals in the house that could gain unauthorized access to the gun(s)? And what of the threat of the gun(s) being stolen when they are unsecured? DC's laws aren't meant to cover just the threat to children. They address the issues of suicide, accidental death, and firearm theft. -CSGV
DC residents, the majority of which support the ban, should have the right to determine their own gun laws.
Because DC is an urban area with a densely packed population, safe gun storage is of great concern, and our strict storage laws contribute to the low suicide and accidental shooting rates.
The issue of non-functional firearms isn't a "red herring". It's proof that D. C.'s gun ban is unreasonable and cannot survive any standard of review if the court rule on an individual right to bear arms (and it appears that it will).
The D. C. law requires all guns to be stored dissasembled or bound by trigger lock and CONTAINS NO SELF DEFENSE EXEMPTION. This means if you ever remove a lock from your gun or re-assemble it in your house, you are breaking the law, even if you do so because an intruder is breaking into your house. Thus Washington's law is not just a handgun ban: It is a total ban on armed self defense.
Furthermore, Justice Scalia brought up several good points about "safe storage" laws. They are too inflexible and do not take into account all the factors involved in each individual house. Thus they end up endangering home owners rather then protecting them.
The dicition on how to best store firearms in order to make them avialable for self-defense but unavailable to unauthorized users is one of the most important decitions a homeowner can make. They should be the ones making that choice based what they believe is best for them and their families, not some politicians who live and work in buildings surrounded by armed guards, metal detectors, and alarm systems. The Politicians in D. C. have no understanding of all the unique security needs for individual citizens, and no buisiness telling them which method they have to use under the threat of fines and imprisonment.
Post a Comment